Security snapshot
Across 11 fcrm-service WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames64%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 11 indexed WordPress sites with fcrm-service, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 63.6% versus 38.5% overall (+25.1 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.5% overall (+17.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected fcrm-service, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| m*g*u*b*g*i*s.com | F | Aug 25, 2026 | |
| c*n*r*l*e*t*e*o*i*l*.com | F | Aug 18, 2026 | |
| m*l*o*u*l*d*l*a*u*e*a*s.c*m.au | F | Aug 14, 2026 | |
| w*h*w*r*f*n*r*l*.c*m.au (WP 6.2.9) | F | Aug 4, 2026 | |
| h*r*t*g*b*o*h*r*.c*m.au (WP 6.2.2) | F | Aug 4, 2026 | |
| g*a*e*u*e*a*s.c*m.au (WP 7.0.2) | F | Aug 4, 2026 | |
| b*u*m*u*t*i*s*u*e*a*s.c*m.au (WP 7.0) | F | Aug 4, 2026 | |
| p*d*i*g*o*s.c*m.au | F | Aug 1, 2026 | |
| f*r*h*w*f*n*r*l*u*a.com | F | Jul 25, 2026 | |
| f*r*h*w*f*n*r*l*.com | F | Jul 25, 2026 | |
| f*r*h*w*f*n*r*l*.c*.uk | F | Jul 21, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1