Across 626 gp-easy-passthrough WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 1%Grade B 3%Grade C 5%Grade D 11%Grade F 80%
Fail the header check (F)80%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames15%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file1.4%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS96%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 626 indexed WordPress sites with gp-easy-passthrough, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 15.2% versus 38.5% overall (-23.3 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 80% vs 82.5% overall (-2.5 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 1.4% vs 1.8% overall (-0.4 pp); HTTPS adoption is 96.3% vs 96.2% overall (+0.1 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected gp-easy-passthrough, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Infrastructure patterns
Infrastructure detected alongside gp-easy-passthrough. Percentages are within sites where that specific signal was detectable; the baseline compares the same signal across detected WordPress sites overall.
Co-occurrence describes technologies observed on the same sites. Detection coverage varies by signal, and an association does not imply that one technology caused or selected another.
Similar security profiles
Closest among widely detected plugins by average difference across header-grade F, username enumeration, exposed-file, and HTTPS rates.