Security snapshot
Across 2 WebMax_Client WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames50%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file100%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 2 indexed WordPress sites with WebMax_Client, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is sensitive-file exposure: 100% versus 1.8% overall (+98.2 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.6% overall (+17.4 pp); Username enumeration is 50% vs 38.6% overall (+11.4 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected WebMax_Client, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Where these sites live — top 1 domain endings
.com
2
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r*a*n*u*a*c*.com (WP 6.7.7) | 2.0.9· 60% conf. | F | Sep 10, 2026 | |
| m*r*h*l*p*e*i*i*n*a*u*a*t*r*n*.com | — | F | Sep 2, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1