Security snapshot
Across 5 aquatherm WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames40%vs 38.7% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 5 indexed WordPress sites with aquatherm, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 100% versus 82.6% overall (+17.4 percentage points).
HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp); Username enumeration is 40% vs 38.7% overall (+1.3 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected aquatherm, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a*u*t*e*m*p*a*a.com (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Sep 11, 2026 | |
| a*u*t*e*m*n*t*a.com (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Sep 11, 2026 | |
| a*u*t*e*m*i*e.com (WP 6.8.8) | — | F | Aug 29, 2026 | |
| a*u*t*e*m.c*.nz (WP 4.7.33) | — | F | Jul 29, 2026 | |
| a*u*t*e*m.com (WP 6.8.6) | — | F | Jul 29, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1