Security snapshot
Across 3 c1m-giraffes WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames33%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with c1m-giraffes, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 100% versus 82.5% overall (+17.5 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 33.3% vs 38.5% overall (-5.2 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected c1m-giraffes, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| s*v*g*r*f*e*n*w.org | F | Aug 19, 2026 | |
| s*v*t*e*i*a*f*n*w.com | F | Aug 18, 2026 | |
| s*v*g*r*f*e*o*.com | F | Aug 18, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1