Security snapshot
Across 3 chongtham WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 33%
Grade F 67%
Fail the header check (F)67%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames33%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with chongtham, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 66.7% versus 82.5% overall (-15.8 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 33.3% vs 38.5% overall (-5.2 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected chongtham, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Where these sites live — top 1 domain endings
.com
3
| Domain | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| s*n*u*c*u*n*a.com | D | Sep 2, 2026 | |
| h*t*e*h*t*a*v*t*o*g.com (WP 5.9.7) | F | Jul 30, 2026 | |
| c*o*g*h*m*i*r*.com | F | Jul 24, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1