Security snapshot
Across 4 clarendon WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 25%
Grade F 75%
Fail the header check (F)75%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames50%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file25%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 4 indexed WordPress sites with clarendon, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is sensitive-file exposure: 25% versus 1.8% overall (+23.2 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 50% vs 38.6% overall (+11.4 pp); Header-grade F is 75% vs 82.6% overall (-7.6 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected clarendon, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h*s*o*i*c*a*e*d*n.com (WP 7.1) | 1.0· 100% conf. | D | Sep 9, 2026 | |
| c*a*e*d*n*k.com (WP 5.3.23) | — | F | Aug 20, 2026 | |
| c*a*e*d*n*o*d*n.com (WP 5.3.23) | — | F | Aug 20, 2026 | |
| c*a*e*d*n*r*s.c*m.au | — | F | Aug 1, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1