Security snapshot
Across 3 cocosmile WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames100%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS67%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with cocosmile, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 100% versus 38.6% overall (+61.4 percentage points).
HTTPS adoption is 66.7% vs 96.3% overall (-29.6 pp); Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.6% overall (+17.4 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected cocosmile, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c*c*-*m*l*.jp (WP 7.1) | — | F | Sep 8, 2026 | |
| c*c*s*i*e*t*z.net (WP 7.0.4) | — | F | Sep 7, 2026 | |
| c*c*s*i*e*t*r*z.net (WP 7.0.4) | — | F | Sep 7, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1