Security snapshot
Across 3 cpf WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames67%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file33.3%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with cpf, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is sensitive-file exposure: 33.3% versus 1.8% overall (+31.5 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 66.7% vs 38.6% overall (+28.1 pp); Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.6% overall (+17.4 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected cpf, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c*f.sk | — | F | Aug 17, 2026 | |
| c*f.o*g.pt (WP 6.8.2) | — | F | Aug 15, 2026 | |
| c*e*t*v*p*o*e*t*o*n*a*i*n.com (WP 4.7.29) | — | F | Jul 20, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1