Security snapshot
Across 5 diako WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames60%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file20%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS80%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 5 indexed WordPress sites with diako, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 60% versus 38.5% overall (+21.5 percentage points).
Sensitive-file exposure is 20% vs 1.8% overall (+18.2 pp); Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.5% overall (+17.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 80% vs 96.2% overall (-16.2 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected diako, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| w*s*b*d*a*o*s*n.de (WP 6.9.7) | F | Sep 7, 2026 | |
| d*a*o*w*f*b.de (WP 6.9.7) | F | Sep 7, 2026 | |
| b*r*h*s*o.com (WP 6.6.7) | F | Aug 24, 2026 | |
| i*a*p*o*o*.ir (WP 7.0.2) | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| d*j*v*d*b.com (WP 7.0.2) | F | Jul 20, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1