Security snapshot
Across 5 dietz WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames40%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 5 indexed WordPress sites with dietz, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 100% versus 82.6% overall (+17.4 percentage points).
HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp); Username enumeration is 40% vs 38.6% overall (+1.4 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected dietz, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| k*n*s*o*o*i*-*i*t*.de (WP 7.1) | — | F | Sep 1, 2026 | |
| i*m*b*l*e*-*i*b*r*.com (WP 7.0.4) | — | F | Aug 17, 2026 | |
| m*i*e*i*t*.de | — | F | Aug 2, 2026 | |
| m*e*s*i*g*l*4.com (WP 6.9.5) | — | F | Jul 31, 2026 | |
| i*m*p*o*i*d*e*z.de (WP 6.9.5) | — | F | Jul 28, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1