Security snapshot
Across 19 diip WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 37%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 5%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 58%
Fail the header check (F)58%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames37%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 19 indexed WordPress sites with diip, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 57.9% versus 82.6% overall (-24.7 percentage points).
HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Username enumeration is 36.8% vs 38.6% overall (-1.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected diip, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s*d*l*i*m*k.ru | — | C | Aug 29, 2026 | |
| c*l*i*.com | — | F | Aug 17, 2026 | |
| k*p*r*u*e.ru | — | A | Aug 16, 2026 | |
| t*m*o*d*p*r*u*e.ru (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Aug 16, 2026 | |
| t*m*o*d*p*r*u*.ru | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| m*l*c*l*-*s*e*t*i*.ru | — | A | Jul 31, 2026 | |
| k*s*a*a*p*r*u*e.ru (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| r*j*-*e*f*m*.ru (WP 6.9.4) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| m*r*y*p*r*u*e.ru (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| o*m*n*e*a*n*-*e*f*m*.ru (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| m*p*r*u*e.ru | — | A | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| m*-*e*f*m*.ru (WP 6.9.4) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| l*-*e*f*m*.ru (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| l*l*b*-*e*f*m*.ru | — | A | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| l*b*r*t*r*o*o*f*t*i*o.ru (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| i*i*i*-*r*g*a*c*.ru | — | A | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| m*l*c*l*s*p*r*u*e.ru (WP 7.0.2) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| b*r*d*-*e*f*m*.ru | — | A | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| l*m*r*c*s*e*i*s.ru | — | A | Jul 27, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1