Security snapshot
Across 2 feminine-munk WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 50%
Grade F 50%
Fail the header check (F)50%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames100%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 2 indexed WordPress sites with feminine-munk, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 100% versus 38.5% overall (+61.5 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 50% vs 82.5% overall (-32.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected feminine-munk, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d*c*u*.com (WP 6.9.7) | 1.0.1· 100% conf. | D | Sep 9, 2026 | |
| b*i*n*l*i*s.c*.uk (WP 7.0.4) | — | F | Aug 17, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1