Security snapshot
Across 4 jinqiang WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 25%
Grade F 75%
Fail the header check (F)75%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames100%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 4 indexed WordPress sites with jinqiang, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 100% versus 38.6% overall (+61.4 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 75% vs 82.6% overall (-7.6 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected jinqiang, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Where these sites live — top 1 domain endings
.com
4
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h*b*f*i*i*l.com (WP 6.8.1) | 1.9· 100% conf. | F | Sep 10, 2026 | |
| c*p*c*i*g*e*t.com | — | F | Sep 3, 2026 | |
| s*n*e*e*u*l*.com (WP 6.8.1) | — | F | Aug 29, 2026 | |
| s*n*e*n*o*.com | — | D | Aug 15, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1