Security snapshot
Across 3 medical-circle-child WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 33%
Grade F 67%
Fail the header check (F)67%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames33%vs 38.7% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with medical-circle-child, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 66.7% versus 82.6% overall (-15.9 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 33.3% vs 38.7% overall (-5.4 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected medical-circle-child, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| e*o*z*.ru | 2.0.0.1558988855· 100% conf. | D | Sep 9, 2026 | |
| c*1*c*e*k*p.org (WP 6.5.10) | — | F | Aug 22, 2026 | |
| c*f*-*a*s*e*a*o*e.org (WP 6.7.5) | — | F | Jul 26, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1