Security snapshot
Across 3 oakhill WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames33%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with oakhill, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 100% versus 82.6% overall (+17.4 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 33.3% vs 38.6% overall (-5.3 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected oakhill, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Where these sites live — top 1 domain endings
.com
3
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| o*k*i*l*i*d*w*a*d*o*r*.com (WP 7.1) | — | F | Sep 6, 2026 | |
| o*k*i*l*e*e*v*.com (WP 6.8.8) | — | F | Sep 6, 2026 | |
| o*k*i*l*o*e*l*c.com (WP 6.7.7) | — | F | Sep 6, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1