Security snapshot
Across 4 rema WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 25%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 75%
Fail the header check (F)75%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames25%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 4 indexed WordPress sites with rema, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 25% versus 38.5% overall (-13.5 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 75% vs 82.5% overall (-7.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected rema, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r*m*m*e*i*g.com | — | F | Sep 4, 2026 | |
| r*m*-*o*n*n.pl | — | F | Aug 30, 2026 | |
| r*m*-*i*t*p.c*m.au (WP 7.0.2) | — | C | Jul 23, 2026 | |
| a*p*a*s*l*n*m*r*e*i*g.com (WP 6.9.5) | — | F | Jul 20, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1