Security snapshot
Across 3 rmf WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames33%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with rmf, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 100% versus 82.5% overall (+17.5 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 33.3% vs 38.5% overall (-5.2 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected rmf, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r*e*n*a*-*u*i*-*o*r*a*.de (WP 6.8.6) | — | F | Jul 29, 2026 | |
| r*y*l*e*i*a*f*u*d*t*o*.org | — | F | Jul 28, 2026 | |
| r*f*o*k*.com | — | F | Jul 19, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1