Security snapshot
Across 4 younglove WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames75%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 4 indexed WordPress sites with younglove, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 75% versus 38.5% overall (+36.5 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.5% overall (+17.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected younglove, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g*k*c*o.com | — | F | Aug 19, 2026 | |
| u*h*k*n.c*.jp | — | F | Aug 18, 2026 | |
| s*g*y*m*c*o*u.com | — | F | Aug 17, 2026 | |
| m*m*t*-*r*c*l*t.com | — | F | Aug 1, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1