Security snapshot
Across 3 m2m-appointment-module WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 100%
Grade F 0%
Fail the header check (F)0%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with m2m-appointment-module, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 0% versus 82.5% overall (-82.5 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 0% vs 38.5% overall (-38.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected m2m-appointment-module, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p*l*s*r*.nl (WP 7.1) | — | D | Sep 4, 2026 | |
| v*v*l*i*l.nl (WP 7.1) | — | D | Sep 1, 2026 | |
| b*i*e*b*s*e*i*k.nl (WP 7.1) | — | D | Aug 31, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1