Security snapshot
Across 4 ameno WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames25%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 4 indexed WordPress sites with ameno, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is header-grade F: 100% versus 82.5% overall (+17.5 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 25% vs 38.5% overall (-13.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected ameno, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a*e*o.c*m.pl | — | F | Sep 8, 2026 | |
| l*f*m*s*n*y.com (WP 7.0.4) | — | F | Aug 24, 2026 | |
| g*r*i*i*e*e*e.it (WP 7.0.4) | — | F | Aug 16, 2026 | |
| a*e*o.ru | — | F | Aug 9, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1