Across 567 jwp-widgets WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%Grade B 0%Grade C 0%Grade D 0%Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS99%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 567 indexed WordPress sites with jwp-widgets, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 0% versus 38.5% overall (-38.5 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 99.8% vs 82.5% overall (+17.3 pp); HTTPS adoption is 98.8% vs 96.2% overall (+2.6 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected jwp-widgets, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Infrastructure patterns
Infrastructure detected alongside jwp-widgets. Percentages are within sites where that specific signal was detectable; the baseline compares the same signal across detected WordPress sites overall.
Co-occurrence describes technologies observed on the same sites. Detection coverage varies by signal, and an association does not imply that one technology caused or selected another.
Similar security profiles
Closest among widely detected plugins by average difference across header-grade F, username enumeration, exposed-file, and HTTPS rates.