Security snapshot
Across 5 c-mo-site-v2 WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 5 indexed WordPress sites with c-mo-site-v2, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 0% versus 38.5% overall (-38.5 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.5% overall (+17.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected c-mo-site-v2, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Where these sites live — top 1 domain endings
.com
5
| Domain | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| s*l*-*a*.com | F | Sep 7, 2026 | |
| y*a*k*t*n*g*r*b*.com | F | Sep 6, 2026 | |
| y*a*k*t*b*e*i*g*k*t*h*n.com | F | Sep 6, 2026 | |
| y*l*a*e*g*f*.com | F | Sep 5, 2026 | |
| y*n*g*b*s*i*t*r*a*e.com | F | Sep 5, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1