Security snapshot
Across 4 canterbury WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 25%
Grade D 25%
Grade F 50%
Fail the header check (F)50%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 4 indexed WordPress sites with canterbury, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 0% versus 38.5% overall (-38.5 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 50% vs 82.5% overall (-32.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected canterbury, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c*n*e*b*r*.jp (WP 6.8) | — | D | Aug 30, 2026 | |
| c*n*e*b*r*c*a*s*c*b*o*s.com (WP 7.0) | — | F | Jul 27, 2026 | |
| c*n*e*b*r*c*e*a*o*i*m.c*.nz | — | C | Jul 25, 2026 | |
| c*n*e*b*r*q*a*a*t*n*.c*.nz | — | F | Jul 24, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1