Security snapshot
Across 15 enom WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 13%
Grade F 87%
Fail the header check (F)87%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS93%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 15 indexed WordPress sites with enom, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 0% versus 38.6% overall (-38.6 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 86.7% vs 82.6% overall (+4.1 pp); HTTPS adoption is 93.3% vs 96.3% overall (-3 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected enom, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1*0*f*e*.com | — | F | Sep 4, 2026 | |
| e*o*.com | — | D | Aug 30, 2026 | |
| l*r*s*i*e.cn | — | F | Aug 13, 2026 | |
| i*t*e*a.com | — | F | Aug 13, 2026 | |
| s*o*t*a*.com | — | F | Aug 13, 2026 | |
| m*o*f*r.c*m.cn | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| h*c*t.cn | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| n*t*d*.com | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| h*o*f*r.c*m.cn | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| x*i*f*.com | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| d*g*.cn | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| e*o*t*a*.com | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| h*o*f*r.com | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| g*c*o*d.c*m.cn | — | F | Aug 8, 2026 | |
| b*y*h*a*d*m*i*s.com | — | D | Jul 22, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1