Security snapshot
Across 2 inoby-antracit WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file50%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 2 indexed WordPress sites with inoby-antracit, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is sensitive-file exposure: 50% versus 1.8% overall (+48.2 percentage points).
Username enumeration is 0% vs 38.6% overall (-38.6 pp); Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.6% overall (+17.4 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected inoby-antracit, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Where these sites live — top 1 domain endings
.eu
2
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a*t*a*i*p*o*e*t*.eu (WP 7.0) | — | F | Sep 8, 2026 | |
| a*t*a*i*.eu (WP 7.0) | — | F | Sep 8, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1