Security snapshot
Across 4 youngevity-rcc WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 4 indexed WordPress sites with youngevity-rcc, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 0% versus 38.6% overall (-38.6 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.6% overall (+17.4 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected youngevity-rcc, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
Where these sites live — top 1 domain endings
.com
4
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| y*u*g*v*t*u*i*e*s*t*.com | — | F | Aug 29, 2026 | |
| y*u*g*v*t*r*.com | — | F | Aug 29, 2026 | |
| c*r*i*b*e*s.com | — | F | Jul 28, 2026 | |
| a*u*g*v*t*.com | — | F | Jul 20, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1