Security snapshot
Across 6 zerif-pro-child WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 17%
Grade D 17%
Grade F 67%
Fail the header check (F)67%vs 82.6% avg
Leak usernames0%vs 38.6% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.3% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 6 indexed WordPress sites with zerif-pro-child, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 0% versus 38.6% overall (-38.6 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 66.7% vs 82.6% overall (-15.9 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.3% overall (+3.7 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected zerif-pro-child, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Version | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| e*a*h.org | — | C | Aug 17, 2026 | |
| 1*8*h*l.ru | — | D | Aug 15, 2026 | |
| m*r*u*d*r*i*.com | — | F | Jul 31, 2026 | |
| u*-*r*z*l.org | — | F | Jul 30, 2026 | |
| w*b*i*e.c*m.au | — | F | Jul 21, 2026 | |
| g*a*p.fr (WP 5.2.23) | — | F | Jul 21, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1