Security snapshot
Across 3 hill-extension WordPress sites indexed by TLDWP, compared to the all-WordPress average.
Grade A 0%
Grade B 0%
Grade C 0%
Grade D 0%
Grade F 100%
Fail the header check (F)100%vs 82.5% avg
Leak usernames67%vs 38.5% avg
Expose a sensitive file0%vs 1.8% avg
Use HTTPS100%vs 96.2% avg
What stands out
TLDWP currently associates 3 indexed WordPress sites with hill-extension, equivalent to 0% of the current WordPress dataset.
The largest measured difference is username enumeration: 66.7% versus 38.5% overall (+28.2 percentage points).
Header-grade F is 100% vs 82.5% overall (+17.5 pp); HTTPS adoption is 100% vs 96.2% overall (+3.8 pp); Sensitive-file exposure is 0% vs 1.8% overall (-1.8 pp).
These are observational associations among sites where TLDWP detected hill-extension, not evidence that the technology, provider, or domain attribute caused a security outcome. See the overall WordPress security baseline.
| Domain | Exposures | Headers | Last Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| d*g*a*o*p*r*t*o*.com (WP 7.1) | F | Sep 4, 2026 | |
| s*a*t*t*c*i*c.com (WP 7.1) | F | Sep 4, 2026 | |
| e*a*t*s*a*.com (WP 7.0.2) | F | Jul 21, 2026 |
Page 1 of 1